Short Synopsis: Researchers compared C-BARQ, IFT, and combination scores from the two tests to see which test helped predict which dogs would succeed at assistance dog training.
All versions of testing identified a dog’s likelihood of success better than chance.
All 3 versions of testing were most accurate for flagging the dogs that were most likely to fail (85%-92% accurate for dogs in the bottom 10%).
All 3 tests were moderately accurate (62-72%) for identifying the dogs in the top 10% (most likely to succeed).
Combining C-BARQ and IFT scores didn’t help much with overall accuracy, but did help identify dogs in the bottom 20% more accurately.
Authors: Emily E. Bray, Kerinne M. Levy, Brenda S. Kennedy, Deborah L. Duffy, James A. Serpell, and Evan L. MacLean
Publication: Frontiers in Veterinary Science
Publication Date: 2019
Applies To: Assistance dogs, C-BARQ
Sample Size: Several thousand